Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Arms
The Tickencote visualize appears to time off about 1650 in respect so you’re able to webpage 3of Certain Ideas of your Wingfield Loved ones from the Wingfield, John M.London: Murray, 1925 republished from the Wingfield Family unit members Community inside the 1991. ISBN0-937543-03-nine.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld regarding Letheringham, their [Sir Robert exactly who d. ily of six or eight sons and you may fivedaughters, and is of him, together with his students and you may grandkids,which played no small-part on the products of your domain out of The united kingdomt, that thepresent performs [Wingfield’s guide] food.
Their oldest young buck are Sir John Wyngfeld regarding Letheringham, Knight, who, having hiswife, setting the two central data from the dated pedigree petroleum paintings whichprovide the topic of this info.
There are 2 of those oictures available, almost identically similar, oneat Tickencote Hallway, Rutland, therefore the most other from the Boughton Home, Northants. Itis unfamiliar the original and you may the copy.
Which couple is actually encircled regarding greatest and you will bottom documents by the all of their sixteen children, inside the per circumstances Wingfield household (1) Bosville and (2) quarterly, Goushell therefore the chequy coating
The one at Tickncote, now owned by Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, try decorated with the canvas, possesses probably already been through it as the about1650, as it is most likely it ended up being the house of your past SirRobert Wingfield of Upton, in Northamptonshire, who’s said to provides diedduring the commonwealth, and many out of whoever oils sketches was at the thattime removed so you’re able to their cousin’s home in the Tickencote, when Upton is ended up selling, andwhich are truth be told there.”
Mcdougal claims you to “the image into the Boughton house can easily be tracedback to help you 1677” (page 4) and gives several statements regarding the mid 1700srefering so you’re able to movement of your image and its demonstration on the Duke ofMontague.
The author claims to the page 6 that “When, or of the whose order, otherwise of the whom it waspainted, continues to be a concern uncertain by professionals.”
Again, my concerns towards the classification heart not in the genealogicalconnections from the players, (the fresh Wingfields had been researched fairlywell real Salzburg in Austria women formariage, and you will even with my typo toward Howard friends, I actually do feel the pedigreeaccurately annotated within RI) but toward logic where safeguards weredisplayed from the latter one or two years. I believe I have an idea of what”should” be on the respective protects, and you may am wanting to know as to the reasons, in this instance,that will not be seemingly what exactly is found. Both I am mistaken inside the myunderstanding, or the Wingfield’s was indeed to experience quite fast and you may loose withtheir palms for the majority goal and that we might not yet learn.
Kelly, thank you for sending me pictures, and due to Tim having rescuing me personally the trouble of placing them on the web. Searching which more as well as the pedigrees for the Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of your Old Saxon Family of Wingfield_, the company grew to become clear in my opinion; what’s more, it seems that discover one glaring heraldic mistake, in the guts, even the supply of the dilemma. I will accept We have not twice-searched all youngsters’ impalings and i get one almost every other unanswered matter (what is the coroneted lozenge regarding straight down sign in?). New red-colored lines seem to superimposed with this visualize on the book are not such useful, together with annotated ‘key’ doesn’t indeed reproduce the words captions and you will cannot describe someone whose possession are offered.
There are 2 fascinating points to the image recommending a couple of various other centers. First, it targets a fifteenth-century matrimony and you will reveals the children of that wedding, however, zero later on question. 2nd, they suggests a guarantee part having lineage as a result of this new seventeenth century.
The latest central panel ‘s the relationships out-of Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) in order to Elizabeth, dau. off Sir John Fitz Lewis and you will Anne (Montacute). The 2 figures kneel in the middle, and are usually surmounted by impalings of the parents’ palms within the wreaths. The heraldic error will be here, as the Sir John’s dad’s end one another house and you may impales Gousell (indeed, Gousell quartered with this specific chequy finish). This is an error. It is noticeable that the quartering regarding Gousell and chequy layer will come in at that point, which cannot be each other quartered and you can impaled on wreath (except if, because of the implication, Sir John who d. 1481 got pulled an enthusiastic Oedipus and you may partnered his or her own mom). One thing Really don’t acknowledge is the coroneted lozenge hanging above the students throughout the all the way down sign in.